As more Australian SMEs turn to the Philippines for scalable remote talent, proper worker classification has become increasingly relevant—even critical.
The stakes are high: the Australian Fair Work Commission (FWC) recently reaffirmed in Pascua v Doessel Group Pty Ltd (2024-2025) that overseas workers may still be considered employees, not contractors, if the employment relationship factors reflect employee-level control and integration.
This case resulted in 15 weeks’ compensation for unfair dismissal, reinforcing how costly misclassification can be – even when the worker lives offshore.
The Philippines also maintains certain enforcement standards under the Labour Code, DOLE, and BIR—each regulating benefits, taxes, and employment status.
For Australian businesses, this means a worker engaged offshore must still be classified correctly under both jurisdictions to avoid liabilities.
Let’s analyse how and why to truly determine whether your Filipino talent is an independent contractor or employee – and to avoid costly mistakes while still reaping the benefits of outsourcing global talent.
Why Worker Classification Matters – Even When You Hire From the Philippines
Correct labour classification protects your business from penalties, backpay disputes, and compliance failures.
It also determines whether the engagement is legally viewed as a contract for services (contractor) or a contract of service (employee).
For Australian SMEs relying on Filipino talent, misclassification risks extend across both Australian and Philippine law.
Legal Implications of Misclassification
Misclassifying a Filipino worker who performs employee-like functions can expose Australian businesses to compliance issues, disputes, and financial liabilities.
Key risks include:
- Exposure to unfair dismissal claims if the worker is terminated without a valid reason or proper process
- Liability for underpayment where contractor fees do not meet certain requirements
- Requirement to pay entitlements normally owed to employees, such as leave, public holiday rates, or penalty rates, if the arrangement is deemed as misclassified
- Breaches of contracting laws, leading to penalties
Tax and Payroll Risks for Australian Employers Hiring in the Philippines
Even if the overseas talent is based in the Philippines, some regulations Down Under will still apply if they’re found to be misclassified – creating risks around taxes, pay, and compliance.
Australian SMEs face:
- Incorrect tax treatment for payments classified as contractor fees but functioning as wages
- Exposure during ATO audits if contractor arrangements resemble employment
- Increased scrutiny under Australia’s sham contracting laws
- FWC jurisdiction if the employment relationship factors tie the worker to Australia
In Pascua v Doessel Group, Pascua successfully claimed unfair dismissal in Australia. The FWC ruled she was an employee, not a contractor, because:
- Her hours followed Australian business schedules
- The employer exercised day-to-day control over her tasks
- She used company tools and systems
- Her role was part of core business operations
This ruling confirms that misclassification risks apply even when workers are offshore.
What Is an Independent Contractor in the Philippines?
An independent contractor operates as a self-employed professional under a contract for services, offering their expertise with full autonomy and minimal supervision.
They typically manage their own tools, taxes, and workflows. Contractors are appropriate only when the engagement type truly reflects independence.
Indicators of a contractor engagement:
- Paid per project, milestone, or invoice
- Exercises control over schedule and execution
- Works with multiple clients
- Uses personal equipment and systems
- No entitlement to government-mandated employee benefits
Key Characteristics Under Labour Law
According to most labour guidelines, a contractor must demonstrate independence from employer control.
These typically include:
- Autonomy over work methods and schedule
- Responsibility for personal taxes and compliance
- Ability to subcontract or delegate tasks
- Operation as a business, not an individual employee
- No integration into the client’s organisational structure
When Is It Safe to Hire Contractors?
Contractor engagements work best for projects that are:
- Scope-based rather than hourly
- Not central to core business deliverables
- Flexible, creative, or specialised
- Short-term or seasonal
- Performed with minimal oversight or reporting obligations
If your relationship requires daily supervision, fixed hours, or KPIs, your contractor likely functions as an employee, creating misclassification risks.
What Defines an Employee in the Philippines?
A worker becomes an employee when the company exerts control over their time, tasks, and work methods.
This creates a contract of service, which mandates full labour benefits, proper payroll handling, and regulated termination processes.
Labour Code Criteria for Employment
When hiring offshore talent, Australian employers must follow Australian employment standards, not rely on contractor labels alone.
The Pascua v Doessel Group Pty Ltd case proved this clearly: even a Filipino worker based overseas can be deemed an employee under Australian law if the business exercises control, sets fixed hours, or integrates the worker into core operations.
This is where an Employer of Record (EOR) becomes essential. An EOR applies the correct classification from the start, making sure the engagement satisfies the standards set for contractors under the law, regardless of what the contract states.
It also prevents sham contracting, protects the business from FWC disputes, and provides compliant employment conditions for the worker.
Mandatory Benefits and Employer Duties
Employees are entitled to statutory protections and benefits, including:
- Contributions to government-mandated benefit or insurance programs
- Guaranteed wage protections and minimum pay standards
- Access to paid leave entitlements
- Overtime and public holiday pay where applicable
- Clear, lawful termination procedures
- Compliance with local job classification and employment regulations
Contractor vs Employee: What’s the Difference?
Employee vs contractor differences influence payroll, taxation, benefits, operational control, and legal liability.
The differences are significant and must match the actual employment relationship.
Legal, Tax, and Operational Differences
Key distinctions include:
- Legal Relationship: contract of service (employee) vs contract for services (contractor)
- Control: employees follow employer-defined workflows; contractors retain autonomy
- Tools: employees receive and utilize company tools; contractors use their own equipment
- Payments: employees receive payroll with taxes withheld; contractors issue invoices and presumably take care of their own taxes
- Benefits: mandatory for employees; none for contractors
- Schedule: fixed hours for employees; flexibility for contractors
Visual Comparison Table: Contractor vs Employee
To make the distinction even easier to understand, here’s a side-by-side comparison that highlights the core differences between an independent contractor and an employee.
|
Factor |
Independent Contractor |
Employee |
|
Engagement Type |
Contract for services |
Contract of service |
|
Control |
High autonomy |
Employer controls work |
|
Tools |
Uses own equipment |
Employer-provided tools |
|
Payment |
Invoice-based |
Payroll with taxes withheld |
|
Benefits |
None |
Mandatory benefits required |
|
Hours/Schedule |
Flexible |
Fixed or employer-set |
|
Risk for AU SMEs |
High misclassification risk |
Low risk under compliance |
Example Scenarios for Remote Teams
Here are some examples of companies successfully running remote teams:
- Atlassian has long embraced distributed teams and remote collaboration, proving remote work can scale globally.
- Canva is an Australian-owned unicorn with staff across multiple countries, leveraging remote teams for design, tech development, and support.
These global companies show remote teams work, but only when roles are classified correctly, tools are in place, and compliance is managed.
What Are the Risks of Misclassifying Remote Workers from the Philippines?
Misclassification exposes Australian SMEs to liabilities even at home Down Under, where regulators increasingly scrutinise offshore contractor arrangements.
Common Mistakes by Australian SMEs
The Pascua v Doessel Group Pty Ltd case showed that certain practices commonly applied to offshore contractors can cause the FWC to classify them as employees instead.
The most frequent misclassification mistakes include:
- Imposing fixed daily working hours that follow Australian business hours
- Supervising and directing daily work tasks as if managing an internal employee
- Assigning ongoing operational or core business duties instead of project-based work
- Providing company email accounts, signatures, or internal tools
- Setting KPIs, performance metrics, or billable-hour requirements
- Expecting exclusivity or long-term availability inconsistent with contractor autonomy
- Integrating the contractor into the internal team structure, including training others
Real Consequences of Misclassification (AU Legal & Financial)
Consequences may include:
- FWC unfair dismissal claims (as seen in the Pascua case)
- Breach of sham contracting provisions
- Liability for backpay, leave, and superannuation (where applicable)
- ATO penalties for incorrect tax treatment
- Legal fees and reputational risk
Financial and Legal Penalties for Australian Employers Who Misclassify Overseas Workers
Penalties can include:
- Retroactive benefit contributions under Philippine law
- Salary differentials and overtime payments
- Tax liabilities in both Australian and Philippine jurisdictions
- DOLE compliance orders
- FWC compensation or reinstatement
- Contractual disputes escalating into cross-border litigation
Contractor-on-Record: A Compliant Alternative
The Contractor-on-Record model guarantees that arrangements with contractors remain legally compliant while maintaining their autonomy.
What It Covers (Payments, Reporting, Legal)
A Contractor-on-Record model provides:
- Legally compliant contract for services drafting
- Contractor payments through compliant channels
- Documentation and invoice record-keeping
- Basic compliance checks to avoid wrongful control
- Tax reporting support for contractors
Benefits Over Direct Contractor Payments
Advantages include:
- Lower misclassification risk
- Cleaner audit trails for both Philippine and Australian regulators
- Consistent, accurate payment processes
- Eliminates the need for international remittances
- Scalability toward EOR if the role evolves
Onboarding Process Through Remote Staff
Remote Staff’s onboarding has speed, clarity, and proper job classification:
- Role scoping to confirm whether the contractor status is valid
- Skills and identity verification
- Legally compliant contract preparation
- Set up of local payment systems
- Alignment on start dates and engagement type
When Should You Use an EOR?
EOR becomes essential when your engagement type begins to look less like an independent contractor arrangement and more like an employee setup.
As soon as increased control over output, fixed hours, company tools, or ongoing responsibilities start reshaping the employment relationship, an EOR guarantees compliance while maintaining operational continuity.
This section explains when it’s time to shift from contracting freelancers to a more structured and compliant model that protects both parties.
Moving from Freelancers to Full-Time Remote Teams
Many freelancers evolve into core contributors, taking on regular schedules, long-term responsibilities, and deeper integration into daily workflows.
At this point, the employee vs contractor differences narrow, and the engagement begins reflecting a contract of service rather than a contract for services.
Thus, an EOR makes sure the worker’s employment status is compliant – so that you won’t have to, even as you maintain control over their output and schedule.

Combining Flexibility and Compliance
An EOR lets Australian SMEs maintain flexibility in how they build teams while conforming to proper labour classification.
Companies still retain direct control over results and outcomes while the EOR manages legal obligations tied to employment.
This creates a balanced structure where autonomy and compliance coexist safely.
Case Example: AU SaaS Company Scaling Legally
Here are real examples of Australian companies with remote teams, demonstrating legitimate distributed-work success:
- Atlassian — Global Distributed Workforce. Atlassian is one of Australia’s largest SaaS companies and a global advocate for distributed teams. Their “Team Anywhere” policy allows them to hire remote talent across multiple countries, including the Philippines.
- Xero — Remote Talent Across APAC. Xero, a leading accounting SaaS platform, operates with remote and hybrid teams throughout APAC, including offshore talent. They emphasise compliance and structured remote work arrangements in all hiring regions.
These companies demonstrate that remote hiring still works, but always within the boundaries of proper worker classification, local labour laws, and well-advised compliance.
How Remote Staff Helps You Stay Compliant
Remote Staff provides the structure, guidance, and legal clarity needed to reduce misclassification risks when hiring Filipino remote workers.
Our services help Australian businesses navigate the complex employee vs contractor landscape and select the right engagement type based on real employment relationship factors.
Helping You Navigate Australian Compliance Around Remote Worker Misclassification
We help businesses assess whether a role aligns with contractor autonomy or employee-level control, as with the Pascua case mentioned earlier.
Our compliance checks make sure that job classification matches day-to-day realities, preventing disputes.
By aligning workflows with Australian regulations, we help you avoid penalties linked to the misclassification of employment status.
Tailored Hiring Models for AU Businesses
Remote Staff offers multiple engagement options, from true independent contractor arrangements to hybrid EOR or full EOR employment, depending on your needs.
We evaluate your operational structure, tools, supervision level, and workflow to recommend the right model.
This guarantees your employment relationship remains compliant as your team grows.
Transparent Pricing, Fast Setup, Legal Coverage
Our pricing models are designed to be simple and predictable, giving SMEs full clarity on payments, onboarding costs, and legal coverage.
We manage contracts, payroll, and benefit administration, so you won’t have to.
With our legal infrastructure in place, your business stays protected from the consequences of misclassification in Australia.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions Australian SMEs ask when navigating worker classification, remote hiring, and compliant cross-border engagements:
How do I know if my Filipino worker is a contractor or employee?
Look at how the work is actually performed. If you set hours, supervise daily tasks, provide tools, or integrate them into ongoing operations, the relationship resembles a contract of service.
If they maintain autonomy and manage their own workflow, they may fit better into a contract for services arrangement.
Can I hire a Filipino contractor through Upwork and be compliant?
Yes, but only if the worker operates independently and the engagement reflects contractor-style control and autonomy.
If your oversight or expectations resemble a full-time employee relationship, hiring through a platform does not remove misclassification risks.
What are the penalties for misclassifying Filipino workers under Australian law?
Penalties can include unpaid wages, backpay, incorrect taxes, sham-contracting fines, and exposure to FWC claims.
If your “contractor” qualifies as an employee under the conditions set by the law, regulators may rule the arrangement invalid, regardless of their location.
Can Remote Staff help with contractor payroll compliance?
Yes. We manage compliant payments, documentation, and reporting through our Contractor-on-Record model.
This reduces the risk of blurring the line between contractor and employee.
What’s the difference between EOR and Contractor-on-Record?
A Contractor-on-Record supports true contractors by managing invoicing and documentation while preserving their autonomy.
An EOR becomes the legal employer when employment relationship factors indicate a contract of service, handling benefits, payroll, and compliance.

Avoid Misclassification–Hire Legally with Remote Staff
Misclassification exposes your business to unnecessary financial, legal, and operational risks—especially when employee vs contractor differences are misunderstood.
Whether you need an independent contractor, a compliance-managed contractor-on-record, or a fully supported EOR model, Remote Staff gives you the legal coverage and on-ground support to hire confidently.
Request a call back now and build your Filipino team without the risk—and without the hassles and costs of setting up a local entity!
- Want FREE AI Prompts for Different Areas of Your Business? Check out these 100 AI prompts.
- Curious About How to REDUCE Overhead Costs? Learn more here.
- If you’re ready to experience the full advantages of working with a top global team, check out our 1,000 fully vetted and highly talented staff here.
Darren Aragon is a multifaceted writer with a background in Information Technology, beginning his career in research at Pen Qatar and transitioning through customer service to a significant role at Absolute Service, Inc. His journey into freelance writing in 2021 has seen him excel across various niches, showcasing his adaptability and deep understanding of audience engagement.




















